September 2014 | 485 U.S. 624 (1988)

Hicks v. Feiock (US 1988)

As a general rule, if a fine paid to complainant will “purge” the penalty, then it is a civil contempt. However, if there are definite penalties, which cannot be purged through compliance, then the action is a criminal contempt. If both civil and criminal relief is imposed in the same action, then the criminal feature of the order is dominant and fixes its character a criminal for purposes of review and burdens of proof.

Hicks v. Feiock.pdf

Sign up to stay up-to-date with news and resources.

Sign Up

YoungWilliams does not endorse the reports or opinions expressed by non-YoungWilliams authors, nor do we endorse the entities that initially released or published the materials posted on our website.