September 2014 | 901 P.2d 1357 (Kan.App. 1995)
Florida Dept. of HRS v. Breeden (Kansas 1995)
Extends the Ross requirement to incoming interstate requests and requires that the best interest hearing must be conducted in the child’s home state. Where a K.S.A. 38-1115(b) paternity proceeding is initiated through an interstate support enforcement mechanism and the child resides in another state, the trial court should await a determination from the court of the initiating state that a blood test establishing paternity is in the best interests of the child before making its determination of paternity.
Sign up to stay up-to-date with news and resources.
YoungWilliams does not endorse the reports or opinions expressed by non-YoungWilliams authors, nor do we endorse the entities that initially released or published the materials posted on our website.